Skip to the ladder
Military Lawyers

All answers, screen 39

  1. Can conflicting medical expert opinions influence the outcome of a BOI involving substance misuse?
  2. Can confidential marital status information be used as adverse evidence in clearance revocation hearings?
  3. Can conduct outside of duty hours be considered maltreatment if it affects a subordinate’s well-being?
  4. Can commissioned officers engage in protest or activism without triggering Article 88?
  5. Can command questioning trigger Article 31 rights obligations?
  6. Can command endorsement of punishment be introduced during sentencing?
  7. Can command delay in processing an appeal be cited as reason to reverse separation execution?
  8. Can command climate reports be used to rebut claims of improper conduct by a single soldier?
  9. Can collateral administrative consequences be challenged after a conviction if not imposed by the court-martial itself?
  10. Can clearance be suspended for alleged behavioral issues that were not substantiated through formal channels?
  11. Can civilian witnesses be compelled to attend an Article 32 hearing?
  12. Can civilian medical appointments conflict with military movement obligations?
  13. Can civilian law enforcement testimony be compelled in a military court-martial?
  14. Can civilian employers be penalized for harboring known deserters?
  15. Can charges be dismissed if a convening authority unlawfully delegates referral authority?
  16. Can character evidence be introduced during an Article 32 hearing?
  17. Can chain-of-command pressure during investigation interviews be raised as a violation of Article 31 rights?
  18. Can both trial and defense counsel present closing arguments at an Article 32 hearing?
  19. Can BOI members consider voluntary waiver of NJP rights as good faith behavior?
  20. Can attempted solicitation of a minor under military jurisdiction be prosecuted under Article 82?
  21. Can attempted fraternization be prosecuted under Article 80 even without a relationship forming?
  22. Can attempt charges be sustained when the act would have been legal but for lack of authorization?
  23. Can attempt and conspiracy be charged for the same underlying conduct in a military prosecution?
  24. Can Article 97 be used to prosecute retaliatory confinement of whistleblowers within a unit?
  25. Can Article 94 be used in conjunction with espionage or treason-related offenses in military justice?